GOP bill would force action on Canada oil pipelineWASHINGTON — Angered by President Barack Obama’s delay of a proposed oil pipeline from Canada, Senate Republicans are moving to force him to act.
By: Matthew Daly, The Dickinson Press
WASHINGTON — Angered by President Barack Obama’s delay of a proposed oil pipeline from Canada, Senate Republicans are moving to force him to act.
A bill introduced Wednesday by 37 GOP senators, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, would require the administration to approve the Keystone XL pipeline within 60 days, unless the president declares the project is not in the national interest.
The State Department decided on Nov. 10 to delay the project until 2013, after the presidential election, to allow the project’s developer to figure out a way around Nebraska’s Sandhills, an ecologically sensitive region that supplies water to eight nearby states.
McConnell, R-Ky., called the $7 billion pipeline the ultimate “shovel-ready” project and said it could create as many as 20,000 jobs.
He and other Republicans called Obama’s decision to delay the project transparently political and said Obama had put his reelection above job creation.
“This is politics, pure and simple,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.
The GOP bill has little chance of approval in the Democratic-controlled Senate. But the measure illustrates Republicans’ frustration over the pipeline delay and their belief that Obama is vulnerable on the jobs issue.
House Republicans are expected to highlight the jobs issue again Friday, during a hearing before the Energy and Commerce Committee on the pipeline project. Several labor union leaders are among those scheduled to testify.
The pipeline project has divided labor groups eager for the jobs it would create from environmentalists and other traditional Democratic allies who oppose the pipeline as an ecological disaster waiting to happen.
The 1,700-mile pipeline proposed by Calgary-based TransCanada would carry as much as 700,000 barrels of oil a day from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, to refineries in Texas, passing through Montana, South Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma.
Supporters say it could significantly reduce U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil while providing thousands of jobs. Opponents say the pipeline would bring “dirty oil” that requires huge amounts of energy to extract. They also worry about possible spills, noting that a current pipeline operated by TransCanada has had several spills in the past year.
The Senate bill’s chief sponsor, Richard Lugar of Indiana, said Keystone XL presented a dramatic opportunity to boost U.S. national security and North American energy production by providing oil from the nation’s closest ally and largest trading partner, Canada.
“President Obama has the opportunity to help create 20,000 jobs now. Incredibly he has delayed a decision ... apparently in fear of offending a part of his political base,” Lugar said.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest called that criticism off-base.
“I recognize that there are people in Washington, D.C., who want to apply a political label to every single thing that the president or other members of this administration do, but at the end of the day this is a decision that falls cleanly in line with the priorities that the president laid out” in a recent interview, Earnest said.